What happened to the artificial-intelligence investment boom?
Perhaps AI is a busted flush. Perhaps the revolution will just take time
Many economists believe that generative artificial intelligence (AI) is about to transform the global economy. A paper published last year by Ege Erdil and Tamay Besiroglu of Epoch, a research firm, argues that “explosive growth”, with gdp zooming upwards, is “plausible with ai capable of broadly substituting for human labour”. Erik Brynjolfsson of Stanford University has said that he expects ai “to power a productivity boom in the coming years”.
For such an economic transformation to take place, firms need to spend big on software, communications, equipment and factories, enabling AI to slot into production processes. An investment boom was required to allow previous breakthroughs, such as the tractor and the personal computer, to spread across the economy. From 1992 to 1999 American non-residential investment rose by 3% of gdp, for instance, driven in large part by spending on computer technologies. Yet so far there is little sign of an ai splurge. Across the world, capital expenditure by businesses (or “capex”) is remarkably weak.
Explore more
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "The missing investment boom"
Finance & economics January 13th 2024
- Xi Jinping risks setting off another trade war
- A guide to the Chinese Communist Party’s economic jargon
- Will spiking shipping costs cause inflation to surge?
- Bill Ackman provides a lesson in activist investing
- What happened to the artificial-intelligence investment boom?
- Has Team Transitory really won America’s inflation debate?
More from Finance and economics
The property firm that could break China’s back
If Vanke collapses, so might confidence in the state’s management of the economy
Narendra Modi’s flagship growth scheme is off to a sluggish start
Without improvements, it risks wasting trillions of rupees
Diego Maradona offers central bankers enduring lessons
Recent years ought to have reduced the importance of a skilful feint. They have not